PDA

View Full Version : Vista's legal fine print raises red flags


Bluvertigo
01-29-2007, 01:15 PM
Vista, the latest version of Microsoft's Windows operating system, makes its long awaited consumer debut tomorrow. The first major upgrade in five years, Vista incorporates a new, sleek look and features a wide array of new functionality, such as better search tools and stronger security.

The early reviews have tended to damn the upgrade with faint praise, however, characterizing it as the best, most secure version of Windows, yet one that contains few, if any, revolutionary features.

While those reviews have focused chiefly on Vista's new functionality, for the past few months the legal and technical communities have dug into Vista's "fine print." Those communities have raised red flags about Vista's legal terms and conditions as well as the technical limitations that have been incorporated into the software at the insistence of the motion picture industry.

The net effect of these concerns may constitute the real Vista revolution as they point to an unprecedented loss of consumer control over their own personal computers. In the name of shielding consumers from computer viruses and protecting copyright owners from potential infringement, Vista seemingly wrestles control of the "user experience" from the user.

Vista's legal fine print includes extensive provisions granting Microsoft the right to regularly check the legitimacy of the software and holds the prospect of deleting certain programs without the user's knowledge. During the installation process, users "activate" Vista by associating it with a particular computer or device and transmitting certain hardware information directly to Microsoft.

Even after installation, the legal agreement grants Microsoft the right to revalidate the software or to require users to reactivate it should they make changes to their computer components. In addition, it sets significant limits on the ability to copy or transfer the software, prohibiting anything more than a single backup copy and setting strict limits on transferring the software to different devices or users.

Continued...

Article: http://www.thestar.com/Business/article/175801

Source: The Star

Bluvertigo
01-29-2007, 01:16 PM
Petition to protect property rights in Information Technology
http://www.digital-copyright.ca/petition/ict/

mander
01-29-2007, 01:24 PM
Vista, the latest version of Microsoft's Windows operating system, makes its long awaited consumer debut tomorrow. The first major upgrade in five years, Vista incorporates a new, sleek look and features a wide array of new functionality, such as better search tools and stronger security.

The early reviews have tended to damn the upgrade with faint praise, however, characterizing it as the best, most secure version of Windows, yet one that contains few, if any, revolutionary features.

While those reviews have focused chiefly on Vista's new functionality, for the past few months the legal and technical communities have dug into Vista's "fine print." Those communities have raised red flags about Vista's legal terms and conditions as well as the technical limitations that have been incorporated into the software at the insistence of the motion picture industry.

The net effect of these concerns may constitute the real Vista revolution as they point to an unprecedented loss of consumer control over their own personal computers. In the name of shielding consumers from computer viruses and protecting copyright owners from potential infringement, Vista seemingly wrestles control of the "user experience" from the user.

Vista's legal fine print includes extensive provisions granting Microsoft the right to regularly check the legitimacy of the software and holds the prospect of deleting certain programs without the user's knowledge. During the installation process, users "activate" Vista by associating it with a particular computer or device and transmitting certain hardware information directly to Microsoft.

Even after installation, the legal agreement grants Microsoft the right to revalidate the software or to require users to reactivate it should they make changes to their computer components. In addition, it sets significant limits on the ability to copy or transfer the software, prohibiting anything more than a single backup copy and setting strict limits on transferring the software to different devices or users.

Continued...

Article: http://www.thestar.com/Business/article/175801

Source: The Star

Thus all the more reason to stay away from it for now. Can we say :kpz:?

Mouse
01-29-2007, 01:40 PM
most secure version of Windows
Not to difficult to achieve. :rolleyes:

Laz
01-30-2007, 03:58 PM
I think it is imperitive that we actively discourage people from purchasing vista; if we allow ms to do this to us there is no telling where this will all lead.

Mr. Apollo
01-30-2007, 06:02 PM
I think it is imperitive that we actively discourage people from purchasing vista; if we allow ms to do this to us there is no telling where this will all lead.Wait what? What else are people supposed to use. The vast majority of programs out there are designed to run on Windows. If by some magical event the world was to switch to another OS the studios, record companies, etc would force them to put in the same copy protection standards.

MOOGLY
01-30-2007, 06:06 PM
Wait what? What else are people supposed to use. The vast majority of programs out there are designed to run on Windows. If by some magical event the world was to switch to another OS the studios, record companies, etc would force them to put in the same copy protection standards.


I dunno my XP didn't stop working as of today. Will be a while before it is a needed upgrade.

Laz
01-30-2007, 06:19 PM
It was reported that ms lost 21 cents a share today, yeah !

Mouse
01-30-2007, 06:22 PM
Never mind that.

How much did Bill loose?

:tooths:

Roman
01-30-2007, 07:19 PM
It was reported that ms lost 21 cents a share today, yeah !

Only 21 cents per share?

Lesley
01-30-2007, 07:45 PM
I was curious about it but had no real desire to upgrade. Now I definitely won't be spending the $$$

Mr. Apollo
01-30-2007, 11:35 PM
I dunno my XP didn't stop working as of today. Will be a while before it is a needed upgrade.True, but in the future you will need Vista. DX 10 is Vista only, the new 64-bit drivers are Vista only and not backwards compatable with XP x64. In a couple of years the vast majority of programs will require Vista.

smirnoff
01-31-2007, 01:40 AM
Fortunaly by then it shall either be changed or hacked to hell to get it to work the way it should.