PDA

View Full Version : Two guys who got a slap on the wrist for fraud



Yogi
09-20-2005, 09:45 PM
CANADIAN PRESS

MONTREAL — The first person convicted of fraud in the federal sponsorship scandal will be going to school instead of prison.
Advertising executive Paul Coffin was sentenced today to a conditional sentence of two years less a day, to be served in the community, for defrauding Canadian taxpayers of $1.5 million. Coffin pleaded guilty earlier this year to 15 fraud charges.

Coffin must obey a 9 p.m. curfew — but only on weeknights — and give lessons on business ethics.

His first lecture is set for McGill University next week.

Justice Jean-Guy Boilard of Quebec Superior Court said he allowed Coffin to avoid jail after considering his clean record, his repayment of $1 million to the federal government, and his remorse.

“Mr. Coffin is genuinely contrite but unfortunately he cannot turn the clock back,” Boilard said in court as Coffin stood in the prisoner’s box to hear his fate.

“In my view, the risk of reoffending is extremely minimal, I would dare say inexistent.”

Boilard said the shame of being branded a convicted criminal is an important part of the sentence. He noted that Coffin, a widower, mortgaged his house, cashed retirement funds and borrowed $500,000 from friends and family to repay his debt.

“His indebtedness is steep,” Boilard said. “His business is in ruins and the rest of his life will be spent repaying his debts.”

Coffin must also hire an independent controller to approve all billing and invoices for his advertising business.

Public Works Minister Scott Brison issued a statement Monday saying the government has now recovered the full amount from Coffin.

Conservative justice critic Vic Toews said the sentence, which he called "hardly an inconvenience" for Coffin, sets a dangerous precedent for other sponsorship prosecutions.

"The only message this sends out is that if you can get away with it, that's fine; if you get caught, you just have to repay the money," he said in an interview.

"What has to be sent out is a message of general deterrence to the public. If you (defraud) the government, you go to prison. The judge has taken a really narrow view of the significance of this."


Coffin, 63, appeared to sigh in relief as the sentence was imposed but he refused to comment as he walked to the court office to turn in his passport and sign papers.

The Crown had asked for a 34-month prison sentence and will consider an appeal, prosecutor Francois Drolet said outside court.

“Our position was that this would not send a clear enough message,” Drolet said.

“This in our view sent a strong shockwave in the community that needed a deterrent message.

“The court does not share that opinion.”

Coffin’s lawyer had suggested the 24-month sentence after his client pleaded guilty in May to defrauding the federal government of the $1.5 million between 1997 and 2002 for doing little or no work.

Coffin was just one player in a program that allegedly saw $100 million in sponsorship funds go to ad agencies friendly with the governing federal Liberals.

In a hearing in August, Coffin said he had no idea anything was wrong with his sponsorship contracts until the federal Public Works Department wanted to review them in 2003. The RCMP raided his office later that year.

He surrendered to the RCMP on Sept. 10, 2003, after learning they wanted to talk to him.

Coffin said he co-operated with investigators and was honest in testimony to the Gomery commission into the program because he heeded his mother’s advice to him as a 10-year-old that “honesty is the best policy.”

The sponsorship program was supposed to promote national unity, especially in Quebec, in the wake of the 1995 referendum.

Chuck Guite and Jean Brault face an Oct. 3 trial on five fraud charges and one conspiracy charge each for alleged crimes related to the program. Brault owned an advertising agency while Guite was the bureaucrat in charge of the program.

Justice John Gomery’s initial report is to be released Nov. 1.

...and then there's Conrad ("Con" for short?) Black's second fiddle who got this....


CHICAGO (CP) - A former top executive in Conrad Black's crumbled media empire pleaded guilty Tuesday to mail fraud and agreed to a lighter-than-expected prison sentence for his testimony against others in an alleged scheme to pilfer more than $32 million US from Hollinger International Inc.

David Radler, the newspaper holding company's ex-chief operating officer, agreed Tuesday to a 29-month jail term and a $250,000 US fine in a deal with the U.S. Attorney for pleading guilty to one count of mail fraud in federal court.

Six other counts against the Canadian-born former publisher of the Chicago Sun-Times will be dropped.

"This is the first step in making amends for what has taken place," Radler's lawyer, Anton Valukas, said after studying a small typed note containing Radler's prepared comment during an elevator ride down to the courthouse floor.

"He is sorry and saddened by the pain he has caused his associates and his family and this is the time for him to move on and make amends and he intends to do so."

Radler, 63, will be sentenced after other cases related to the alleged fraud are wrapped up. He has agreed to co-operate with authorities and testify if required.

"It is absolutely possible that it could be years before Mr. Radler is sentenced," former SEC enforcement lawyer and former U.S. federal prosecutor Jacob Frenkel said in an interview.

"The hammer over the co-operator's head is the importance of the prosecutor giving full credit for the co-operation at the time of sentencing."

U.S. Attorney Eric Sussman, who is prosecuting the case, said in an interview Tuesday that "we haven't even wrapped up our investigation yet." He declined to say how long that might take.

While there was no indication when a judge would sentence Radler, the plea agreement stated that "should the criminal proceeding(s) in which the defendant's testimony is required by the government become inordinately delayed, the government will agree to proceed with the sentencing of the defendant."

The U.S. Attorney's Office has alleged that Radler, Black's former right-hand man, supervised negotiations of newspaper sales through which he and other Hollinger managers pocketed millions of dollars in fees that should have gone to the company.

Radler was widely expected to plead guilty and possibly testify against Black - should charges be laid against his former associate and friend - who was Hollinger International's chairman and CEO.

Black has not been charged with any wrongdoing although he faces a criminal investigation by U.S. and Canadian authorities.

Radler, holding company Ravelston Corp. and former Hollinger in-house lawyer Mark Kipnis were each charged with five counts of mail fraud and two of wire fraud in August. Kipnis, 58, pleaded not guilty and is free on a $250,000 US bond.

They were accused of diverting $32 million US through a series of secret deals by disguising the money as noncompete fees connected to the sale of U.S. newspapers to other companies - legal arrangements commonly used in the publishing industry

Radler is now free on a $500,000 US bond which he secured with $50,000 cash. He is allowed to travel to his Vancouver home and will not be extradited from Canada as long as he attends his U.S. court appearances voluntarily. His next appearance is scheduled for Nov. 7.

While Black was the high-profile face of the Hollinger publishing empire, it was Radler who did much of the work building the company begun in the 1960s with the purchase of the Sherbrooke Record in Quebec into Canada's biggest newspaper chain.

The son of a Montreal restaurant owner, Radler was the hard-nosed manager who made the cuts that helped produce the cash to build the Black-controlled company into a global publisher which also owned the London Telegraph, the Jerusalem Post in Israel and Chicago Sun-Times.

The former Southam newspapers in Canada bought by Hollinger in the mid 1990s were sold to CanWest Global Communications in 2001 for $3.2 billion Cdn.

The 32-page plea agreement revealed in court states that Radler "has clearly demonstrated a recognition and affirmative acceptance of personal responsibility for his criminal conduct."

On Tuesday, judge Amy St. Eves asked the former high-powered newspaper executive a series of humbling questions to determine whether he was mentally fit to enter his plea.

Asked whether he was in good health, Radler replied: "I hope so." Questioned about possible substances affecting his decision-making ability, Radler told the court he had one drink the previous evening and half a sleeping pill before bed.

Radler's plea agreement also states that if he files an application for the International Prisoner Transfer Program, the government will not oppose it. That means Radler could potentially serve his sentence in a Canadian prison.

Sussman declined to say whether Radler had requested that part of the agreement. The plea moves the Hollinger saga into the criminal arena, and a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission civil action against Hollinger and its directors has been stayed "pending the outcome of any future criminal actions," an SEC official said Tuesday.

"We at the SEC are gratified to see this guilty plea and the co-operation he's pledged with the Securities and Exchange Commission in our action," said Tim Warren, the commission's associate regional director.

The SEC's case named not only Radler, but Black as well.

"We've alleged that there was significant harm to public shareholders in this situation," Warren said. "Millions of dollars in non-competition fees amongst other related parties transactions were pocketed by Mr. Radler and, as we've alleged in our action, by Conrad Black."

Radler will be "asked to testify truthfully in the government's case as well as the SEC's case, and co-operate with it in preparation," he said.

Asked whether Radler will testify against Black, Warren would say only "he may be asked to testify in future actions. . . for that, we will have to stay tuned."

At least one major Hollinger shareholder, Eugene Fox of Greenwich, Conn.-based Cardinal Capital Management, turned out to watch the Chicago proceedings.

Ravelston - a privately held Canadian company that Black and Radler used to control Black's newspaper empire - went into receivership after they resigned this April. It is the majority owner of Hollinger Inc., the Toronto-based holding company that has voting control over Hollinger International.

Ravelston's arraignment on the charges is set for Thursday.

The counts of mail fraud against Ravelston, Kipnis and Radler stem from documents the defendants were sending in relation to non-compete fees and other matters. Non-compete fees are paid by the buyers of newspapers to ensure the sellers don't set up a competing newspaper in the same market.

For example, Sussman told St. Eves on Tuesday that the U.S. government could prove beyond a reasonable doubt that around Feb. 8, 2001, Radler, Kipnis and Ravelston sent an envelope from Chicago containing non-compete agreements with the American Publishing Co. to the executive vice president of Hollinger Inc. in Toronto, and about $2.9 million US in cheques related to the agreements, in violation of U.S. securities law.

Each count carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

© The Canadian Press, 2005

Walter
09-21-2005, 05:15 AM
And Martha Stewart went to jail......for IMHO less grievious acts.

But then we can't forget that we let suspected murders and hoodlums out on bail which would mean that the justice system if the same for all.....I would like to see more media attention on this aspect of our judicial system.

Swordfish
09-21-2005, 06:12 AM
And Martha Stewart went to jail......for IMHO less grievious acts.

But then we can't forget that we let suspected murders and hoodlums out on bail which would mean that the justice system if the same for all.....I would like to see more media attention on this aspect of our judicial system.


Why am I not surprised that coffin got a sentance like this. Perhaps they were roommates with Martha Stewart and shared stock tips when they got sent to camp

It makes me Ill when the rich get a slap on the wrist but if we do something similar we get throwen away for life.

Walter
09-21-2005, 06:01 PM
Is it any wonder!

Tim
09-21-2005, 06:46 PM
wonder who's fault it is the Liberal's popularity is growing...
;)

Swordfish
09-22-2005, 12:32 PM
Hey man I vote NDP (Federally) Cuz I feel its time for a change and I dont like Stephen Harper.

eddyk
09-22-2005, 12:57 PM
And Martha Stewart went to jail......for IMHO less grievious acts.

Obstruction of justice, conspiracy and making false statements is less grievous?

She got five months in a minimum security prison and five months of house arrest which is the US federal minimum. And she still walks away from this incident a wealthy woman who now has her own TV show.

Paul Coffin (who has gone into debt to pay back the money) got two years less day of house arrest. His business is in ruins and he will enter his retirement years in the hole a few hundred thousand dollars. What more would you like to do to him?

I LIKE EGGS
09-22-2005, 03:13 PM
Obstruction of justice, conspiracy and making false statements is less grievous?

She got five months in a minimum security prison and five months of house arrest which is the US federal minimum. And she still walks away from this incident a wealthy woman who now has her own TV show.

Paul Coffin (who has gone into debt to pay back the money) got two years less day of house arrest. His business is in ruins and he will enter his retirement years in the hole a few hundred thousand dollars. What more would you like to do to him?

He should have gotten the chair LOL j/k.....I wonder what would the average taxpayer get if they ripped off the government vs government stealing from taxpayers?

Walter
09-23-2005, 06:16 AM
Obstruction of justice, conspiracy and making false statements is less grievous?

She got five months in a minimum security prison and five months of house arrest which is the US federal minimum. And she still walks away from this incident a wealthy woman who now has her own TV show.

Paul Coffin (who has gone into debt to pay back the money) got two years less day of house arrest. His business is in ruins and he will enter his retirement years in the hole a few hundred thousand dollars. What more would you like to do to him?

She did not steal money from the government and the whole thing started over a simple denial of insider trading. The fact that she seems to be bouncing back is great and while Coffin has "suffered" whether he bounces back is up to him. And I will just bet that somewhere, in his wife's name, is a little nest egg it will let him go out for the occassional coffee and donut.

You might want to read what the "left wing" media is saying......


Editorial: Coffin got off lightly
Sep. 22, 2005. 01:00 AM

Montreal ad executive Paul Coffin defrauded the Canadian taxpayer of $1.55 million in the federal sponsorship scandal. Prosecutors wanted him put away for almost three years. That seemed about right

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1127339413180&call_pageid=968256290204&col=968350116795

Tim
09-23-2005, 08:07 AM
since when is it more of a crime to steal money from the government?

Must be one of the 'right' or 'left' thingies.

Yogi
09-23-2005, 10:11 PM
Paul Coffin (who has gone into debt to pay back the money) got two years less day of house arrest. His business is in ruins and he will enter his retirement years in the hole a few hundred thousand dollars. What more would you like to do to him?
Cry me a friggin' river....

He should have thought of that before stealing the money!

His friends bailed him out, and loaned him $$$ to pay the fine. The guy can still declare bankruptcy tomorrow morning, stiff his "friends", and not have to pay anyone back. It's all unsecured debt.

That guy should have been jailed for at least 10 years. Hard time. No friggin' parole. He stole from you and me and everyone else on this board who pays taxes eddyk.

You NDP'ers will never learn. Coddle, coddle, coddle to the criminal element ad nauseum. :p

I LIKE EGGS
09-26-2005, 03:50 PM
since when is it more of a crime to steal money from the government?

Must be one of the 'right' or 'left' thingies.

What would you get for stealing money from a bank? Whether it be a late night break in or computer related theft......I believe you would be punished more.

I LIKE EGGS
09-26-2005, 03:59 PM
Cry me a friggin' river....

He should have thought of that before stealing the money!

His friends bailed him out, and loaned him $$$ to pay the fine. The guy can still declare bankruptcy tomorrow morning, stiff his "friends", and not have to pay anyone back. It's all unsecured debt.

That guy should have been jailed for at least 10 years. Hard time. No friggin' parole. He stole from you and me and everyone else on this board who pays taxes eddyk.

You NDP'ers will never learn. Coddle, coddle, coddle to the criminal element ad nauseum. :p

I agree YOGI 106%

Eddyk.....chances are a good majority of Canadians will be in debt by retirement......on an HONEST living. SO sorry I cannot sympathize.....if I were to steal from the government I can bet my life that there would be worse consequences to pay than what Mr Coffin got.

eddyk
09-26-2005, 08:21 PM
Cry me a friggin' river....

He should have thought of that before stealing the money!

His friends bailed him out, and loaned him $$$ to pay the fine. The guy can still declare bankruptcy tomorrow morning, stiff his "friends", and not have to pay anyone back. It's all unsecured debt.

That guy should have been jailed for at least 10 years. Hard time. No friggin' parole. He stole from you and me and everyone else on this board who pays taxes eddyk.

You NDP'ers will never learn. Coddle, coddle, coddle to the criminal element ad nauseum. :p


I agree YOGI 106%

Eddyk.....chances are a good majority of Canadians will be in debt by retirement......on an HONEST living. SO sorry I cannot sympathize.....if I were to steal from the government I can bet my life that there would be worse consequences to pay than what Mr Coffin got.

If I thought that sentencing Paul Coffin to 34 months in jail, like the Crown requested, would discourage any other political insider from committing a similar crime, I would have been more enthusiastic for a 34 month sentence for Paul Coffin. (The maximum sentence possible would have been ten years and even the crown attorney was realistic enought to not ask for anything close to it.) But I am also a realist as well as a New Democrat and I know such shananigans have being going on for years among governments, Grit and Tory, Federal and Provincial.

Since Coffin has admitted wrongdoing, apologized to the Canadian people and made financial restitution, punishing him to the full extent of the law would not teach him a lesson but would be an additional cost the tax payer. The fact that the Crown Attorney is considering an appeal is a waste of money under the circumstances, but when it comes to punishing Liberal Party supporters, no ammount of money is too much for some people.

Or maybe you two are nostalgic for the days when scoundrels were locked in shackles in the public square where the mob were free to throw rotten fruits and vegetables a them.

If Coffin cheats his friends, I guess he will lose a lot of friends. And he did mortgaged his house to borrow some of the money to pay back the Canadian taxpayers so that debt is secured.

Would you have been treated harsher for stealing from the government? I do not know because I do not know what you stole from the government.

I do not coddle criminals. I simply refuse to waste my time on llegal judgements beyond my control when more important issues are at stake.

The judge in this case is a tax payer like the rest of us and if he feels that Paul Coffin is sufficiently penitent and has suffered enough, I am willing to accept his decision and move on. I have got my own life to live. We still have the trials for Chuck Guité and Jean Brault. The business of the country needs to be tended to and Jack Layton cannot run the government by himself.

Athlon_9800
09-26-2005, 10:03 PM
His rather small punishment in no way surprises me. It just makes me realize more how ****ty the system is.

Law
09-26-2005, 11:14 PM
His rather small punishment in no way surprises me. It just makes me realize more how ****ty the system is.

The system has a nice big hole in it, that hole is called "judge"

Athlon_9800
09-26-2005, 11:18 PM
The system has a nice big hole in it, that hole is called "judge"

Or money... or greed... or.. well the list could go on.

eddyk
09-27-2005, 12:04 AM
Greed or Avarice ("excessive love of money and power") is one sin found in our society.
So is

Lust ("excessive love of the flesh")
Gluttony("excessive love of pleasure")
Sloth("love of idleness")
Wrath("love of justice perverted to revenge and spite")
Envy ("love of one's own good perverted to a desire to deprive others of theirs")
Pride("love of self perverted to hatred and contempt for one's neighbor").

The only way we can avoid them is by utilizing the seven virtues>
Humility, Generosity, Love, Kindness, Self control, Temperance and Zeal.

You can either wallow in the sins of the world, and grow more cynical and suspicious or embrace the virtues and acheive inner peace and atonement.

Good night.

Walter
09-27-2005, 08:45 AM
Greed or Avarice ("excessive love of money and power") is one sin found in our society.
So is

Lust ("excessive love of the flesh")
Gluttony("excessive love of pleasure")
Sloth("love of idleness")
Wrath("love of justice perverted to revenge and spite")
Envy ("love of one's own good perverted to a desire to deprive others of theirs")
Pride("love of self perverted to hatred and contempt for one's neighbor").

The only way we can avoid them is by utilizing the seven virtues>
Humility, Generosity, Love, Kindness, Self control, Temperance and Zeal.

You can either wallow in the sins of the world, and grow more cynical and suspicious or embrace the virtues and acheive inner peace and atonement.

Good night.

You present a righteous and strong argument to cut the guilty some slack and as long as they are repetent, at least verbally and in public, they should be held up as examples of heros to the zealots that feel that as long as they get their share of the cradle to grave bonanza they will forgive...hell tomorrow it might be them asking for forgiveness.

Yogi
09-27-2005, 08:16 PM
If I thought that sentencing Paul Coffin to 34 months in jail, like the Crown requested, would discourage any other political insider from committing a similar crime, I would have been more enthusiastic for a 34 month sentence for Paul Coffin.
I think a 34 month jail sentence is far more likely to discourage at least ONE political insider from committing fraud than the farce Coffin got. The difference here is that Coffin still had the means to repay what he stole and the "cry me a river" judge fell for it and used that to mitigate his so-called sentence.

This in itself perpetuates the reality that there is a law for the rich, and a law for the poor in this country. To better instill equality, we need equal sentencing for equal crimes, regardless of whether or not you "pay back" what you stole. Loss of freedom (i.e. jail time) should apply to everyone.

Athlon_9800
09-27-2005, 08:54 PM
I think a 34 month jail sentence is far more likely to discourage at least ONE political insider from committing fraud than the farce Coffin got. The difference here is that Coffin still had the means to repay what he stole and the "cry me a river" judge fell for it and used that to mitigate his so-called sentence.

This in itself perpetuates the reality that there is a law for the rich, and a law for the poor in this country. To better instill equality, we need equal sentencing for equal crimes, regardless of whether or not you "pay back" what you stole. Loss of freedom (i.e. jail time) should apply to everyone.

Exactly. Good points.